Common mistakes in CO₂ emissions calculations
In recent years, quite a few questions have been raised about the sustainable nature of EVs and this skepticism was not always straightforward. This has resulted in a distorted picture and (conscious or unconsciously) errors in calculations. A number of examples based on recent research by Eindhoven University of Technology:
1. Exaggeration of greenhouse gas emissions from battery production
Upscaling and smarter engineering (such as heat conservation in the production process) have dramatically reduced the amount of energy that factories need to produce battery cells. At the same time, the electricity used is steadily becoming low-carbon. All of this downsizes the EV’s “ climate backpack, ” but many EV-critical studies ignore this completely. Examples are findings by Buchal, Karl and Sinn, ADAC, ÖAMTC and Joanneum Research, who assume that 175 kg CO₂ per kWh battery is emitted during battery production. They base this on a very controversial study from 2017. This study was updated in 2019, whereby the emissions were corrected to 85 kg CO₂ per kWh. This means that the ‘climate backpack’ of the electric car has been halved.
2. Underestimation of battery life
Many studies (e.g. Buchal, Karl and Sinn, ADAC, ÖAMTC and Joanneum Research) assumed that a battery would last an average of only 150,000 km. Buchal, Karl and Sinn even compare this with a sustainable diesel car that lasts 300,000 km. However, there are no examples where this was based on factual research, according to the TU. Empirical data shows that modern batteries most likely last more than 500,000 km. New studies even claim that with current technology two million kilometers is possible. In addition, the lifespan of cars is increasing in Europe and an average modern car can be expected to travel 250,000 km.
3. Tampering and reassessment
In addition, laboratory studies were carried out in the past that were paid for by car manufacturers (think of the cheat diesels). That resulted in the unveiling of cheat software that kept emissions artificially lower. In addition, new research on greenhouse gas emissions has shown that emissions related to gasoline and diesel production are higher than previously thought.
The above calculations show that an EV is clearly more sustainable than a car that runs on fossil fuels. Not immediately when it rolls off the assembly line, but usually within a year. Moreover, sustainable technology will only get better in the coming years and EVs will only become more sustainable. Electricity generation is getting greener every year due to the increase in solar and wind energy. An EV that you buy now is more sustainable than a fuel car, but in ten years it will be much more. Both the power and the battery packs become more sustainable, and with it the EV as such. In a subsequent article, the types of green electricity used by an EV and its future will be further discussed.
Car News2 years ago
Polestar is recalls over 2000 electric cars due to software bug
AVIATION2 years ago
Photo News: Air Peace commence flight operations to South Africa
Car News3 years ago
Suzuki’s 2020 V-Strom 1050 goes high-tech in high style
AUTO STAKEHOLDER2 years ago
FRSC COMMENCES ENFORCEMENT OF NATIONAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IN DRIVER’S LICENCE PROCESSING
WHEELSCLINIC6 years ago
Chinese-built railway turns tourist attractions in Kenya
Car News3 years ago
Super rich Banana Island residents set for new X7
Classic Cars6 years ago
Range Rover mark decades of peerless design
Car News6 years ago
See world’s most expensive Rolls-Royces ever-built